[mb-style] RFC: Transliterations/translations, again!

[Nikki]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:47:26PM +0100, Chris Bransden wrote:
> regarding 'virtual' translations (ie done by users, not printed on
> sleeves) - i do agree they should be linked, as they're obviously in the
> DB, however i don't think they fit here under the current system, as
> they're not physical releases. if there was a 'virtual' release type,
> then yes that would make them much more acceptable. however, i don't
> think this affects the need for this AR, as there are legit printed
> releases that need the relationship, nevermind 'virtual' ones

And since mo has agreed to add the 'virtual' type to his attribute
restructuring anyway, that's taken care of too.

--Nikki