[mb-style] RFC: Allowing "Duplicate" Releases w/ Different Titles

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2006/12/5, MLL <webmll at laposte.net>:
> Frederic Da Vitoria a écrit :
>
> >> Exact dupes
> >> with same name just need 2 different release dates. Exact dupes with
> >> different names.... well, read on. )
> >
> > You lost me, here. Read on where?
>
> Just the next paragraph. :) "Now, I have a proposal..."
>
> >> Now, I have a proposal that *might* please everyone: we could give a
> >> release several names provided each one corresponds to discs that have
> >> exactly the same tracklisting & duration. Kind of "alias", but for
> >> releases.
> >>
> >> That would make both "Complete Piano Sonatas (disc 2)" guy and "Piano
> >> Music to Sooth the Soul" guy happy I think.
> >
> > I like the idea, IMO an AR is much better than a Style. But what about
> > clusters? Or do we hope that this will happen rarely enough for us to
> > accept clusters? (note that the proposed style would create clusters
> > too, in a way).
>
> You lost me here. I was not speaking of ARs, only being able to give a
> release several titles. So no clustering problems.
>
> >
> >
> >> ( In the time being, I for one have no problem applying BoxSetNameStyle
> >> case (1). Makes sense to me. )
> >>
> >> MLL
> >
> > Could someone post an "actual" example of applying BoxSetNameStyle to
> > duplicate releases with different titles? I can't clearly see how this
> > would work.
>
> For me, BoxSetNameStyle says 'Thou shalt call the release "Piano Music
> to Sooth the Soul"'
>
> MLL

What about "Complete Piano Sonatas (disc 2)"?

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria