[mb-style] Re: split artist release title
Bogdan Butnaru
bogdanb at gmail.com
Tue Jul 4 07:41:54 UTC 2006
BTW, how come we still don't have "demo" and "split" as album
attributes? Is there a technical dificulty, or something
"ideological". It doesn't seem hard at first thought.
Oh, and I'd vote for "A / B" & attribute split, unless the release
actually has a clear artist-defined name.
-- Bogdan Butnaru — bogdanb at gmail.com
"I think I am a fallen star, I should wish on myself." – O.
On 7/4/06, Aaron Cooper <cooperaa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/06, Jan van Thiel <zout at gewis.nl> wrote:
> > On 12/9/05, Jan van Thiel <zout at gewis.nl> wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if we need a guideline for naming (not specifically
> > > titled) split artist releases.
> > >
> > > For a split by artists A and B, I've come across the following variations:
> > > - "A / B"
> > > - "A / B split"
> > > - "A/B split"
> > > - "Split"
> > > - "[untitled]"
> > > - ...
>
> To add to the list, I've seen "A / B (split)" as well. I think we
> should have a "Split" album attribute, then we could drop "split" from
> the album titles and just use "A / B".
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list