[mb-style] AbbreviationStyle and [trad.], [anon.]

[azertus]

I think the original argument was that the abbreviated forms in these
two cases were much more common. That doesn't seem to be the case
though. Use Last.fm to compare "traditional" [1] with "trad." [2]... I
see no reason not to be consistent with our no-abbreviations-rule
here! (wow, 3 negations)

P.S.: I suggest you don't look at the number of users using our format :p [3]

[1] http://www.last.fm/music/traditional
[2] http://www.last.fm/music/trad.
[3] http://www.last.fm/music/%5Btrad.%5D

2006/11/13, Lukáš Lalinský <lalinsky at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> is there some reason why are these "artist" names abbreviated? I think they
> should be renamed to [traditional] and [anonymous].
>
> I actually wanted to just do it a non-autoedit, but mo conviced me to ask before
> doing it. :)
>
> -Lukáš
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
>