[mb-style] MultipleTitleStyle with similar classical pieces
Aaron Cooper
cooperaa at gmail.com
Wed Nov 29 12:16:07 UTC 2006
On 11/29/06, Leiv Hellebø <leivhe at broadpark.no> wrote:
> mll wrote:
> >
> > Looks fine to me, too. I'd prefer avoiding ampersands, i.e. always commas.
>
> Any good reasons to stray further from original release title other than
> your personal preference?
>
> > Except that for the sake of happy searching, as someone said, I'd prefer the
> > singular, so:
> >
> > 'Symphony No. 4, No. 7 / "King Stephen" Overture'
> > and in the other example
> > 'Symphony No. 91, No. 92 "Oxford" / Scena di Berenice'
> >
>
> 1) Using the singular is illogical when there are two.
>
> leivhe
I don't think that the singular form (Symphony No. 1, No. 2) is
illogical because I read it as "Symphony No. 1 and Symphony No. 2".
If we were to write the full release title for a disc that has two
symphonies on it, we would either write "Symphony No. 1 / Symphony No.
2" or "Symphonies No. 1 & [No. ]2". We have made the first form
shorter by simply writing "Symphony No. 1 / No. 2" so I don't think
it'd be hard to say that "Symphony No. 1, No. 2" means the same.
I wish I could explain it better than that :)
--
-Aaron
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list