[mb-style] Should we change Classical Rules?
Christopher Aillon
caillon at redhat.com
Tue Oct 3 15:26:17 UTC 2006
David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:46:49PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> [snip]
>>> The way it is not "a win" is that the recording of Bach Violin Concerti
>>> will no longer be collected together with the other recordings of Bach
>>> Violin Concerti.
>> Why won't it? As I understand it, it will still show up in the exact
>> same spot it shows up in Bach's artist page right now. Or is there
>> something blatantly obvious that I'm missing?
>
> Possibly the fact that while the album will show up in the artist page
> on musicbrainz.org, the album likely *won't* show up under Bach in
> album/artist organized music players out there.
>
>
> Actually, in some hypothetical idyllic future, I think the correct way
> to do this is to independently store the composer and performer as
> attributes of the album in the musicbrainz db. Then it's up to an
> option / heuristics in the tagger app as to which db field gets
> shoehorned into the Artist metatdata field on the audio file.
> NextGenerationScheme may be capable of this, I haven't had a chance to
> look at the details enough to know.
Interesting. What is the timeline on it, and where do I learn more?
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list