[mb-style] RFC: ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle

[Dave Smey]

Um, I just finished logging my suggestions and objections into the wiki
doc.  Is that not what we were just invited to do?  Lemme know and I will
clean it out.

On Tue, October 3, 2006 4:32 pm, Frederic Da Vitoria said:
>
> I'd rather disagree with point 2 for two reasons:
> a - the limits will always be difficult to define and we risk edit wars
> b - precisely, it changes the database semantics, worse it makes the
> semantics vary depending on something that is, to say the least, not
> obvious
> (from a dumb computer's point of view): the release title. =
>

Outside of Frederic's technical vantage point, point 2 just doesn't seem
desirable to me.  I'll just remind all that I posted a very polite and
constructive list of releases that point 2 would seem to apply to under
the "RFC[?]" subject, and await comments.

(OK, so it wasn't polite to say that James Levine has a big head.  He
does, though.)

-DS