[mb-style] artist type: project

[Kerensky97]

If this is what I think it is I'm all for it (NOT the solo project discussion
right?).  But it's been a while since it was discussed and I can't seem to
find the resolution.  How exactly is it being implemented and how will it
affect the grouping of artists?  Is there a link to the test server where
this was running for us to play with?

I don't want to be a pest but a quick recap might help forgetful people like
me and people new to MB in the last few months.

-Dustin (Kerensky97)


Ryan McCabe wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:56:04PM +0200, pankkake wrote:
>> We need it badly. I saw a lot of artists that could fit in this category.
> 
> I'd really like to see it, too. There are a bunch of releases attributed
> to projects on the FAX
> (http://www.discogs.com/label/Fax+%2B49-69%2F450464)
> label that it'd be appropriate for. Check the edit history for
> "Virtual Vices," "Sultan," "Silence," etc. If you're bored..
> 
> 
> Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/artist-type%3A-project-tf2419753s2885.html#a6746976
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.