[mb-style] CSG: Multi-track movements

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2006/10/19, David Gibson <musicbrainz at gibson.dropbear.id.au>:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:50:19AM -0400, Dave Smey wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Ok, I have a draft wiki page for the proposed change at:
> > >     http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MultiTrackMovementStyle
> > >
> > > I haven't linked to ProposedStyleGuideline or otherwise Intertwingled
> > > yet, was going to see if there was any feedback on the content or
> > > formatting of the page first.
> > >
> >
> > Two reactions:
> >
> > I would introduce the definition / instructions as to what you should do
> > *first*, rather than the example.
> >
> > Also, I wonder if this should be a free-standing style guide as you've
> > written it now.  It's actually a very simple point that could probably be
> > integrated directly into CSG when the time comes.  (Specifically, it could
> > be appended to the "track title" section.)
>
> Quite so... I didn't see what the procedure was for suggesting a
> change to an existing guideline.
>
> > To that end, you might also want to look for an example that is less
> > sprawling than the Beethoven finale, just so it takes up less room.
>
> True.  That may mean finding a suitable disc and editing suitably.
> Will try to look at that this evening.
>
> --
> David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
>                                 | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Slightly shorter (6 tracks rather than 9):
http://musicbrainz.org/release/7ddccdbf-cea8-4725-a685-074523c08d7f.html.
But we'd have to edit it to the new rule first!

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria