[mb-style] ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle - seems to have passed!

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2006/10/19, Dave Smey <autodave at davesmey.com>:
> Well, it looks like ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle has passed its RFV.  I
> edited out the part in the draft where it said that it was only
> provisional, and I edited in references to the new exceptions into the
> ClassicalStyleGuide.
>
> If for some reason this is not correct, the CSG edits can always be
> reverted, and of course the draft and the CSG edits are still open to
> tweaking.
>
> One bit of unfinished business is editing all of the releases we cited
> as examples so that they are 100% consistent with the new guidelines.  I
> actually linked to some releases on the test server, lest I be
> accused of making edits that were not official policy.  I'll edit them
> for real and relink them soon.
>
> Thanks to everyone for all your input - I'm glad we got something done!
>
> Cheers,
> -DS

CSGDiscussion being probably one of the biggest pages in the wiki, and
discussions about classical being so long to resolve, I'd like to
reorder "Covers" section in it (it helps me stay optimistic ;-) )

So examples 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 are to be put under their performers, 5,
and 7 under their composers, 6 would stay under VA, 4 remains
borderline. If nobody objects, I will move this section under
"Approved...". Furthermore, I plan to split CSGDiscussion in two,
creating a CSGDiscussionArchive to store what is currently under
"Approved..."

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria