RFC: BonusDisc ammendment (was: Re: [mb-style] x (disc 1) & x (disc 2), vs x & x (bonus disc) / version info for special releases)

Frederic Da Vitoria davitofrg at gmail.com
Mon Sep 18 10:34:27 UTC 2006


2006/9/18, Chris Bransden <chris at whenironsattack.com>:
>
> On 18/09/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think it makes sense. Are there examples of more than one bolus disc?
> If
> > so, we would need some way to distinguish them by title (even if they
> don't
> > have a specific title).
>
> "(bonus disc 1)" / "(bonus disc 2)" maybe? i guess it follows with
> DiscNumberStyle



Yes. But it must be noted. Or else we will get some "(bonus disc) (disc 1)"
too!

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20060918/1cb2bf0e/attachment.htm


More information about the Musicbrainz-style mailing list