[mb-style] RFC: Change Default Data Quality

[Lauri Watts]

On 7/8/07, Frederik 'Freso' S. Olesen <freso.dk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/7/2, Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com>:
> >Just reviewing the emails since my revision on June 27, the only suggested
> >point of discussion appears to be the change in terminology from
> >"Verified/Unverified" to "Voted/Unvoted"? I still think the former the
> >better terminology, but I'm willing to go with the latter if it gets this
> >through. :)
>
> I, too, prefer Verified/Unverified to Voted/Unvoted. Just for the
> record.

I strongly prefer voted/unvoted to verified/unverfiied.

-- 
Lauri Watts