[mb-style] [Clean up CSG] Correct punctuation (was: Typography)
David K. Gasaway
dave at gasaway.org
Fri Feb 15 04:28:56 UTC 2008
The following is a reply I made earlier in the week, that I fudged and
sent directly to Bogdan only. In turn, his fine reply came directly to
me, probably inadvertently. I hope that he'll repost. Sorry for the
confusion.
On 11 Feb 2008 at 17:44, Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> I understand and (partly) agree all three arguments I left standing
> above. But there's one thing that's bothering me: they can just as well
> apply to all our other rules.
I can't outright disagree with any of what you said. Instead, I've
been pleading that we consider the relative value versus the cost. In
other words, a little bit of incorrectness might be worth the savings
in
hassle for the users.
> No-one (yet) argued we should impose a perfect standard twice the size
> of what we have now and then out-vote anything that doesn't conform. The
> proposal was just to define correctness in the (few and rather uncommon)
> cases where the current rules are "just use ASCII", and replace the rule
> with "Please do it the nice way if you can and care. Use ASCII if you
> want to add something, but don't change it if someone does it the nice
> way". I think that would scare anyone away.
My problem with this approach the end result: A database where the
rules are not applied uniformly and the data is inconsistent. Worse,
this
inconsistency is *explicitly condoned* by the guidelines.
--
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org
-:-:- Web: dave.gasaway.org
-:-:- MusicBrainz: dkg
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list