[mb-style] CSGStandard?

Andrew Conkling andrew.conkling at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 02:39:17 UTC 2008


Hi Leiv,
Thanks for the reply and the re-welcome. I haven't left MBz, just stopped
participating in the discussion.

On Feb 18, 2008 5:23 PM, Leiv Hellebo <leiv.hellebo at gmail.com> wrote:

> But I should also mention that recently a few new twists have been
> introduced in the edit at
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8347705.  Here people have
> broached the subject of how the NGS might affect how we deal (or should
> deal) with classical titles. I'm sorry to say I don't understand that
> stuff yet.


...and I see I've missed a lot. :D In the context of that discussion there,
I tend to fall on the side of getting all the names (fully) consistent, so
this CSGStandard sounds like a good idea.

Curious if there are any other details, but would also like some pointers on
where to jump in.... :)

Cheers,
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20080218/0cb229ea/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Musicbrainz-style mailing list