[mb-style] CSG

Lukáš Lalinský lalinsky at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 12:54:19 UTC 2008


On Ut, 2008-02-26 at 07:36 -0500, Aaron Cooper wrote:
> I disagree with luks.  A work title not only identifies a larger
> work  
> but also the individual "movements" of those works.  Classical "songs"  
> don't have "titles", unless you consider common names like "Eroica" a  
> title.

I wasn't walking about work titles at all, nor about classical "songs".
What we have in MB are track titles, which sucks for classical, but
that's the way it is. Track titles will always depend on the context in
which they are released, so trying to make them absolutely identify
musical works in all cases doesn't make sense to me. Reformatting is
fine, standardization is fine, but changing the title to something
completely different than on the cover isn't (in my opinion). We should
wait for actual musical work entities with that.

Lukas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?ISO-8859-1?Q?digit=E1lne?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podp=EDsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8Das=C5=A5?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_spr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20080226/d471315b/attachment.pgp


More information about the Musicbrainz-style mailing list