[mb-style] CSG
Andrew Conkling
andrew.conkling at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 13:13:47 UTC 2008
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:04 AM, symphonick <symphonick at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/2/26, Aaron Cooper <cooperaa at gmail.com>:
> > I disagree with luks. A work title not only identifies a larger work
> > but also the individual "movements" of those works. Classical "songs"
> > don't have "titles", unless you consider common names like "Eroica" a
> > title.
> >
> Wha? A title of a song is not a title if it's classical? Now I'm
> confused again :(
> Winterreise, Op. 89: I. Gute Nacht
> Sonata quasi una Fantasia, Op. 27 No. 2 "Mondschein": III. Presto agitato
> Alle Menschen müssen sterben, BWV643
>
> "Moonlight" is a common name, "Presto agigato" a tempo/character, but
> the rest look like titles to me? I'm missing something here, right?
>
I'm pretty sure you're agreeing with Aaron. I think he means you can't,
practically speaking, just say "Allegro con brio" for track 1 without the
work title. He's saying the work title, e.g. "Symphony No. 3" is important
to identify the individual tracks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20080226/de314c97/attachment.htm
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list