No subject

no actual wording saying feat. ever ought to have been used in CSG.  It was
a single example, the Lark Ascending one, which had existed at least since
the wiki-changeover, and from what I could find, looked like it dated back
to the very initial proposal for CSG as an example without guideline
actually instructing anything relating to the example. - and that would
indeed put it long before ARs existed.  :)

Brian

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Brant Gibbard <bgibbard at ca.inter.net>
wrote:

> >
> > How about we don't add any of this information to the track
> > titles and just use Advanced Relationships?
>
> That would be my strong preference as well. I would wonder if the current
> wording dates from before we had ARs to handle this sort of thing much
> more
> effectively.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>

------=_Part_17496_5533021.1208905820131
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline