[mb-style] Composition/Performer/Production ARs at Release or Track level?

[Lukáš Lalinský]

On St, 2008-01-02 at 09:44 -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Once everything is said and done, I will suggest also that I can, with
> FauxFaux's help getting the data (and a lot of time to process them
> all into the database), use my script to "devolve" release level ARs
> down to track-level ARs, if I know which editors are willing to say
> that every single time they added a release level AR, it applied only
> to every single track on the release, and in that way, save a lot of
> time manually moving them. 

I've like to ask you to not do this. Currently we have the data we have,
and we can say they are correct. If you move all of them automatically
to tracks, you will add many incorrect ARs to the database. Leave this
to people who actually know about the releases/tracks.

> For the moment, the people I know who did strictly follow that
> interpretation are myself, drsaunde - and I'm guessing Lauri as well.
> Assuming such were to be done, is there anyone else who can say that
> all the release-level production/performance ARs they've ever added
> were 100% only "applies to every single tracks" ARs? 

I'm willing to bet that it's not 100% for anybody.

Lukas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?ISO-8859-1?Q?digit=E1lne?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podp=EDsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8Das=C5=A5?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_spr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20080102/a6a46611/attachment.pgp