[mb-style] [no label]

[Lauri Watts]

On Jan 5, 2008 1:58 AM, Olivier <viapanda at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Yes, I agree on that. There would be no value in having a label
> > [unknown]. I fear it could even encourage people to use [unknown] for
> > the wrong purpose (e.g. instead of [no label self-released]).
>
> Fact is, we already  have an [unknown] label...
> While I certainly agree with your points it doesn't make much sense,
> actually I fear this is the kind of beast that just can't be chased
> away by good wishes, and that will just keep popping up again, used
> for exactly what we fear it would.
> Accepting it on the other hand makes it at least possible to maintain
> some control on it - through a preventive annotation, and through
> subscription (though yeah, we don't have labels daily edits digests
> mails).

That is pretty much my thoughts on it too.  We're not going to get rid
of it, we should at least steer it a little.
-- 
Lauri Watts