[mb-style] [Clean up CSG] Capitalization (and placement) of types and tempos

[David K. Gasaway]

On 30 Jan 2008 at 18:06, Brian Schweitzer wrote:

> I have to admit, I seriously hope this attitude towards tempos (and it
> seems you also mean form too, if movement numbers are sufficient?)
> isn't the prevailing one, given that the movement number only
> identifies which movement, so you lose the ability to know anything
> about the work.  

If I didn't make the point clear, let me state it categorically: I do 
not support removing tempo markings from movement titles.

> While it may be seen as pedantic, some people actually care about that
> info... and just are looking for a good way to form it cleanly.  :P

If I may be blunt in turn, what's best for a few detail-oriented folks 
isn't necessary what's best for MusicBrainz or CSG.  You have it 
entirely within your power to add whatever information you like to your 
personal database, wiki master list, or tags.  I do (being a person of 
obsessive perfectionist slant myself), but that doesn't mean I'd foist 
that cruft on CSG. :)

I've been trying (unsuccessfully?) to frame these discussions in the 
perspective of the average user.  My views may or may not be 
representative, but I'd like to know that these folks have been given 
due consideration.

-- 
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org
-:-:- Web: dave.gasaway.org
-:-:- MusicBrainz: dkg