[mb-style] CSG compromise?

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Brian Schweitzer <
brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Now we have ARs, and we can implement work lists
> (though not quite as flexible of ones as we'll eventually have under
> NGS).   Right?  :)


I must have missed an episode, here. Which ARs are you talking about? What
is the relation to work lists?


Now, I still care as far as not duplicating needlessly, so I still
> think having 3, 4, 6, 10 listings for the same release, just in
> different languages, is truly wasteful.  And assuming we do agree to
> do something like a real work list and real linking ARs, regarding
> track titles, I'm happy.  But I would hope, for what's left after we
> then pull CSG out from releases, we can still find some way to avoid
> this needless duplication, with all the additional maintenance and AR
> work it implies.


Maybe by expanding the pseudo-release concept... I know it was not meant for
this, but it would technically work.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20080302/9ff7e04a/attachment.htm