[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes then implied)

[Aaron Cooper]

On 3-Mar-08, at 4:34 PM, symphonick wrote:

> 2008/3/2, Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com>:
>> Summary:
>> Proposal: Add pre-NGS works lists, change the intent of CSG [snip]
>
> Interesting!
> I'm listing 3 movements as they appear on the cover ("real" examples).
> Can you, for every mvt, list:
> a) the "tracktitle"
> b) the "worklist/NGS"-title
> Just to get the big picture, we can argue about details later :-)
>
> Ex. 1:
> Sonate e partite per Violino Solo
> Disco 1
> Sonata n. 1 BWV 1001, in sol minore.
> ---
Work: Sonata for Violin No. 1 in G minor, BWV 1001: {movement #}.  
{movement tempo}
  - I don't know where the movement name is here...
Title: I'd really have to see the cover I guess, I can't interpret  
that information.


> Ex. 2:
> Konzert für Klavier, Violine, Violoncello und Orchester C-dur op. 56
>>> Tripelkonzert<<
> Concerto for Piano, Violin, Violoncello amd Orchestra in C major, Op.
> 56 >>Tripel Concerto<<
> Concerto pour piano, violon, violoncelle et orchestre en ut majeur,
> op. 56 <<Triple Concerto>>
> 2. Satz: Largo
> ---

Work: Concerto for Piano, Violin, Cello, and Orchestra in C major, Op.  
56 "Triple Concerto": II. Satz. Largo
- (I don't know what "Satz" means though)
Title: "Concerto for Piano, Violin, Violoncello amd Orchestra in C  
major, Op. 56 <<Tripel Concerto<<: 2. Satz: Largo"
- ...and I throw up at the idea of that being in someone's track title  
field.


> Ex. 3:
> КОНЦЕРТ
> ДЛЯ СКРИПКИ И ВИОЛОНЧЕЛИ
> С ОРКЕСТРОМ
> ля мцнор, соч. 102
> 1. Allegro
Work: Concerto for Violin, Cello, and Orchestra in {the key}, Op. 102:  
I. Allegro
Title: Again, I can't parse that info (I can just copy and paste to  
translate.google.com)

-Aaron (cooperaa)