[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes then implied)
Aaron Cooper
cooperaa at gmail.com
Mon Mar 3 22:22:21 UTC 2008
On 3-Mar-08, at 5:18 PM, symphonick wrote:
> 2008/3/3, Aaron Cooper <cooperaa at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On 3-Mar-08, at 4:34 PM, symphonick wrote:
>>
>>> 2008/3/2, Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com>:
>>>> Summary:
>>>> Proposal: Add pre-NGS works lists, change the intent of CSG [snip]
>>>
>>> Interesting!
>>> I'm listing 3 movements as they appear on the cover ("real"
>>> examples).
>>> Can you, for every mvt, list:
>>> a) the "tracktitle"
>>> b) the "worklist/NGS"-title
>>> Just to get the big picture, we can argue about details later :-)
>>>
>>> Ex. 1:
>>> Sonate e partite per Violino Solo
>>> Disco 1
>>> Sonata n. 1 BWV 1001, in sol minore.
>>> ---
>> Work: Sonata for Violin No. 1 in G minor, BWV 1001: {movement #}.
>> {movement tempo}
>> - I don't know where the movement name is here...
>> Title: I'd really have to see the cover I guess, I can't interpret
>> that information.
>>
> Ah, it's one track for the whole sonata here.
Oh well, then I'd link the track to all 3 (or 4) movements of the
sonata work and the title would just be "Sonate n. 1 BWV 1001, in sol
minore" I guess.
>
>
>>
>>> Ex. 2:
>>> Konzert für Klavier, Violine, Violoncello und Orchester C-dur op. 56
>>>>> Tripelkonzert<<
>>> Concerto for Piano, Violin, Violoncello amd Orchestra in C major,
>>> Op.
>>> 56 >>Tripel Concerto<<
>>> Concerto pour piano, violon, violoncelle et orchestre en ut majeur,
>>> op. 56 <<Triple Concerto>>
>>> 2. Satz: Largo
>>> ---
>>
>> Work: Concerto for Piano, Violin, Cello, and Orchestra in C major,
>> Op.
>> 56 "Triple Concerto": II. Satz. Largo
>> - (I don't know what "Satz" means though)
> "movement"
>
>
>> Title: "Concerto for Piano, Violin, Violoncello amd Orchestra in C
>> major, Op. 56 <<Tripel Concerto<<: 2. Satz: Largo"
>> - ...and I throw up at the idea of that being in someone's track
>> title
>> field.
> :) Well, it's exactly what's written on the cover... BTW why did you
> choose English for the first half?
Because it was easier for me to write it out in English than try in
German. On the topic of languages, I think we should try to pick one
language per composer (as we've done with the wiki works lists) do
reduce the duplication.
-Aaron
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list