[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes then implied)
Aaron Cooper
cooperaa at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 21:41:35 UTC 2008
On 5-Mar-08, at 4:35 PM, David K. Gasaway wrote:
> Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
>> Thus, actually, why I'd opposed the implementation of the parody AR
>> as
>> an attribute to the cover AR. The cover AR is distinctly a "song
>> instance"-"work listing" AR, linking from one artist's recording back
>> to another artist's work listing.
>
> I didn't get a clear picture of how you would enter a cover. Would
> the covering artist have an entry in the works list for the cover
> will an AR to the composition? If not, I don't think it's fair to
> say that a cover is necessarily a cover of a composition. It could
> be a cover of a specific performance (i.e., specific variation in
> lyrics, instrumentation, rhythm, or whatever else you could imagine).
The picture I see is both artists having a work in their worklists
with one linked to the other with a Cover AR. The original
composition will also have Composition/Lyrics/Arranged/etc ARs but not
the cover version.
-Aaron
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list