[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes thenimplied)

Brant Gibbard bgibbard at ca.inter.net
Tue Mar 11 11:34:28 UTC 2008


> The only objection I recall is the wording of the AR for 
> works lists to tracks.  Personally, it may sound overly 
> academic, but I prefer "is an instance of" over "contains a 
> recording of", if only because I think, if/when we do add 
> sessions as the NGS entities between track masters and work 
> lists, I think we'd want to save that particular 'contains a 
> recording of' wording for the AR we'd then use to link the 
> session to the work list.  Can anyone suggest any other 
> alternate wording, besides 'an instance of', which wouldn't 
> cause us confusion with track masters or sessions later down the line?
> 
> Brian

"Contains a performance of" or "Is a performance of"?


Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON




More information about the Musicbrainz-style mailing list