[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes thenimplied)
Brant Gibbard
bgibbard at ca.inter.net
Tue Mar 11 11:34:28 UTC 2008
> The only objection I recall is the wording of the AR for
> works lists to tracks. Personally, it may sound overly
> academic, but I prefer "is an instance of" over "contains a
> recording of", if only because I think, if/when we do add
> sessions as the NGS entities between track masters and work
> lists, I think we'd want to save that particular 'contains a
> recording of' wording for the AR we'd then use to link the
> session to the work list. Can anyone suggest any other
> alternate wording, besides 'an instance of', which wouldn't
> cause us confusion with track masters or sessions later down the line?
>
> Brian
"Contains a performance of" or "Is a performance of"?
Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list