[mb-style] RFC: Works lists (and other related changes then implied)

[Mike Morrison]

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> The only objection I recall is the wording of the AR for works lists
> to tracks.  Personally, it may sound overly academic, but I prefer "is
> an instance of" over "contains a recording of", if only because I
> think, if/when we do add sessions as the NGS entities between track
> masters and work lists, I think we'd want to save that particular
> 'contains a recording of' wording for the AR we'd then use to link the
> session to the work list.  Can anyone suggest any other alternate
> wording, besides 'an instance of', which wouldn't cause us confusion
> with track masters or sessions later down the line?
>
> Brian

Just so I understand, if/when we have sessions, what would be the AR 
wording? Would the chain go something like this?

Track is an instance of Track Master
Track Master is a ???? of Session
Session contains a recording of Work

Mike