[mb-style] Bach passions and CSG
Leiv Hellebo
leiv.hellebo at gmail.com
Fri Mar 21 11:36:13 UTC 2008
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> A side note to this, by the way, I've noticed a few new classical
> editors just in the past few days who have been going through and
> either adding new releases or editing existing releases into the "no
> work in the title" format you're suggesting; when I've asked why,
> they've said they're using some of the trial-balloon edits like this
> one as examples from "classical editors who know how to do it".
Any examples of this? I've been very good at keeping my
vote-on-edits-for-your-subscriptions-queue empty the last weeks, and I
have not seen it. (Feel free to mail me in private, this is probably not
interesting for the general public.)
Just
> wanted to add the note of caution when we do do trial balloon edits
> like this; some of the editors who don't participate in the lists and
> who don't really know CSG well yet are paying attention to everything
> we do, but not the reasons we do it...
Yes, I understand what you mean and I'll keep that in mind :)
I guess my only defense here is that this is for stuff for which there
exists no hard rules for: Even the CSG is just a guide, and before my
time it was not so common to add work titles to operas e.g.
>
> While I'm writing here anyhow, I would really like to get things
> moving towards resolution / approval on the work list stuff so we can
> get back to CSG. The RFC and such have been out for several weeks now
> - is there anyone who would veto at this point; or if we held the work
> list RFCs until luks actually has work lists implemented, would there
> be anyone now opposed to the part of that RFC that moved the "full
> details" CSG to be only for work lists?
Sorry, I am of no help as I didn't understand half of that thread, and I
actually thought that there were some unresolved issues there.
(We also still need to
> discuss, as like with this trial series of edits, what would then be
> "simple classical style" for use on the releases themselves, if the
> full CSG is moved away from that purpose...)
This is for another thread :)
Leiv
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list