[mb-style] Bach passions and CSG
Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 05:53:57 UTC 2008
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Chris B <chris at whenironsattack.com> wrote:
> On 21/03/2008, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > If you generalized this procedure, how would you enter (in the current
> > > > state of the MB database)
> > > >
> > http://musicbrainz.org/release/86a78b3d-08d6-4b42-990b-30463b66fc98.html
> > ?
> > >
> > > My mail concerned Bach passions. It is not so common to mention the BWVs
> > > for them (and I know I have Händel oratorios which do not mention the
> > > HWVs - I recently checked some - yet this is *never* a problem).
> >
> > Well, you know that this is contrary to the CSG?
>
> the un-agreed on CSG!
No, actually, it's also contrary to the *official* CSG, massively
outdated as that guideline is.
Brian
More information about the Musicbrainz-style
mailing list