[mb-style] [CSG] Short form CSG (was Re: Bach passions and CSG)

[Brant Gibbard]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: musicbrainz-style-bounces at lists.musicbrainz.org 
> [mailto:musicbrainz-style-bounces at lists.musicbrainz.org] On 
> Behalf Of Brian Schweitzer
> Sent: March-22-08 7:20 AM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mb-style] [CSG] Short form CSG (was Re: Bach 
> passions and CSG)
> 
> While we're discussing what guidelines for tracks to use, let 
> me toss out one other possiblity, something I know I've seen 
> at least a few dozen times...  What about misidentified 
> works?  Not typos, not simply "correct work but not enough to 
> really ID it", but true misidentifications?
> 

My preference would be to correct outright errors, and put the correct
identification (or at least "current interpretation") in the titles, but
make a note of the mis- or outdated- identification in an annotation to
reduce the likelihood of others with the same recording not realizing and
perpetuating the discrepancy.