[mb-style] What do we consider a catalogno in Musicbrainz ?

[god_emperor at interia.pl]

I agree - probably one cat# is from label and second (or more) is from distributor, manufacturer, country distributor, etc.
I always try to follow http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/HowToIdentifyLabels and make research, which one is really label (good point that it's probably the smallest) and include rest of informations in annotation (maybe in future there would be also specific place to write info about distributor).

Levittoux

Per Ă%uFFFDyvind Ă%uFFFDygard napisał(a):
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:34:40 +0200, ijabz >ijabz at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> > and then sometimes this is followed by a number like 4509-93067-0 (and
> > sometimes not) , which is then reproduced with checksum as the barcode
> > 745099306700
> 
> In my experience this is usually due to it actually being two cat#s, not 
> 
> one. I wish I could find an example, but I can't think of one right now. 
> 
> Essentially it's just two labels being involved, and using both. It's not 
> 
> that uncommon when bigger labels (who use ean subsets) are distributing, 
> 
> etc. releases for smaller labels.
> 
> You should most certainly make a release event for the smallest label, and
>  
> probably make a duplicate event for the bigger label as well, though I  
> guess it depends how they're involved. I don't think anyone will cry if  
> we're missing an emi release event either way.
> 
> -- 
> Per / Wizzcat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> 
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doladuj w promocji telefon! 
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f18