[mb-style] RFC: Modify AdvancedRelationships page in wiki

Brant Gibbard bgibbard at ca.inter.net
Wed Jan 7 17:57:39 UTC 2009


+1

Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON
http://bgibbard.ca 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: musicbrainz-style-bounces at lists.musicbrainz.org 
> [mailto:musicbrainz-style-bounces at lists.musicbrainz.org] On 
> Behalf Of Aurélien Mino
> Sent: January-07-09 12:43 PM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mb-style] RFC: Modify AdvancedRelationships page in wiki
> 
> + 1
> 
> (and + 1 for Chad who perfectly expressed what I thought ;)
> 
> - Aurélien / murdos
> 
> Chad Wilson a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > This is sorely needed in order to point editors to - thanks 
> Brian for 
> > bringing it back up again.
> >
> > There are still AutoEditors (and other experienced editors) 
> editing in 
> > opposition to that earlier discussion due to the lack of 
> formalisation 
> > in the guidelines.
> >
> > Chad / voiceinsideyou
> >
> > On 7/01/2009 11:34 p.m., Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> >   
> >> It's been pointed out to me by an editor figuring out where to put 
> >> what AR that the consensus of the long threads last year never did 
> >> actually make it into the style guidelines.
> >>
> >> So, in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/AdvancedRelationships , 
> under the 
> >> current text in the ArtistRoleInheritance section, add (wording 
> >> totally cribbed from Lauri, back on 7/14/2008, with 
> modifications for 
> >> style guideline clarity):
> >>
> >> Strike: "The page ArtistRoleInheritance 
> >> <http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ArtistRoleInheritance> goes into the 
> >> implications of this in some depth."
> >>
> >> Add:
> >> ------------------
> >> 1. If the Advanced Relationship is applicable to all tracks on a 
> >> release, put it on all the tracks, rather than on the release.
> >> 2. If the Advanced Relationship is not applicable to all 
> tracks, and 
> >> you know which ones it applies to, put it on only those tracks.
> >> 3. If the Advanced Relationship is not applicable to all 
> tracks, and 
> >> you don't know which ones it applies to, put it at release 
> level.  A 
> >> basic effort to determine to which tracks the relationship is 
> >> applicable is appreciated, however.
> >> 4. If the credit is release level, and does not apply on a 
> track by 
> >> track basis (e.g., mastering for the whole album), then apply the 
> >> Advanced Relationship to the release, not the tracks.
> >>
> >> Note: There are still releases that do only have release level 
> >> Advanced Relationships, predating the discussions as to where 
> >> Advanced Relationships should be attached.  These still 
> need to be corrected.
> >> If you find a release with such release level Advanced 
> Relationships 
> >> that can be moved to the tracks, please fix them.
> >> ------------------
> >>
> >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ArtistRoleInheritance also needs more 
> >> severe modification and updating, but that's the scope for 
> some other 
> >> RFC; this would only change 
> >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/AdvancedRelationships
> >>
> >> Brian
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> >> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >>     
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style




More information about the Musicbrainz-style mailing list