[mb-style] RFC: Modify AdvancedRelationships page in wiki

[Chris B]

2009/1/7 Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com>:
> Not to stray too far from the RFC, but re case 4, for album mastering,
> perhaps mastering volume/compression levels across the entire release,
> rather than track master mastering?

'album wide' mastering is used in 99% of releases, yet still it should
always be a track level AR under these rules IMO. if you load up one
track in that album, it is mastered by the guy who did the mastering
for the release, just as it might feature guitar by the guitarist for
the release/band, etc.

> I know I've seen the rare release that
> actually credited track by track mastering, but also credited "album
> mastering" or "album remastering" separately.  Perhaps those latter ones
> would be the case 4, with the former being case 2.  (And all those case 1
> fuzzies making it confusing by still being at the release level :P).

i would have thought the former would apply to all tracks EXCEPT those
mentioned as being mastered by someone else. it would be really rare
to see someone master on top of a master (that's like re-encoding an
mp3), but if they did that IMO would be a case of assigning 2
masterers to the track level, seeing as both are responsible for
changes to that audio.

sorry to keep banging on about this but i think we have to be really
clear about the the kind of ARs we mean. i suppose essentially it
could be audio-related ARs at track level (or release level if they
are fuzzies), and non-audio related ARs at release level. is that what
we mean?