[mb-style] RFC: Replace ALL CSG* pages in the wiki with the sandbox version (Was: Re: The return of [clean up CSG]???)

[Chris B]

2009/1/13 Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com>:
> But CSG is the framework; the intent is to say how to formulate the title,
> not where to use it.  Saying where to use it or not, in my opinion, would be
> the place of a "Classical Guideline" document, not a "Classical *Style*
> Guideline" document.

hmm, i don't think there is this meaning there. all the other 'style'
guidelines are about how to adapt (or 'style') data found in
track/release titles to a consistent format. and wasn't the old CSG
essentially doing this? cos it seems wrong to get rid of that and
replace it with something that says how we should enter *works* rather
than releases.

however the new document might covers all areas, in a way. it's just
like, with a release you take the data (tracklisting) you have and
style it to the desired format (ignoring anything that isn't mentioned
or a mistake), but with a work you would presumably research all the
details and get a complete picture (?) leading to more elaborate
tracktitles, etc. if that's the intention then maybe we can satisfy
both sides with some kind of use case examples?