[mb-style] CSG: Classical "superworks" and "performance of" links

[symphonick]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:15:03 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria  
<davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/7/18, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosarevok at gmail.com>:
>> I am looking at
>> http://musicbrainz.org/work/51ef99ac-488d-4c35-bef3-fc25bf73ca39
>> (Divertissement, Op. 38 by Fernando Sor). We have a recording of the
>> full work in one go, and a recording of each of its two movements.
>> Should the full recording be linked to both movements, or to the full
>> work as it is now?
>
> To the full Work IMO. I understand linking to both movements would
> mean the same, but linking to each movement would seem unnecessarily
> complicated to me, and I don't see any benefit in doing so. Imagine a
> full opera in one take...
>

In this case I think it doesn't matter.
Otherwise I agree with Calvin (  
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2011-June/012280.html  
) that the most accurate way is to link to all performed movements.

A try to interpret the results of that discussion:

Recording linked to the relevant works (parts): accurate
Recording linked to the super-work: fuzzy - a performance of the whole  
super-work, but unsure about exactly which parts are performed
Recording linked to the super-work with "partial performance" AR: not  
identified - a performance of one or more parts (or part of a subpart)

/symphonick