[mb-style] RFC-327: Featured Artists
swisschris at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 20:39:37 UTC 2011
Restricting the guideline to recordings & release groups would certainly
make things go smoother. For the ws/1 issue i'd see something like we have
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Andii Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 14:00, Kuno Woudt <kuno at frob.nl> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On 18/07/11 14:43, Andii Hughes wrote:
> >> On 18 July 2011 13:32, Kuno Woudt<kuno at frob.nl> wrote:
> >>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style/Track_and_release_titles
> >>> ^ that is the entire guideline which applies to track and release
> >>> There is no "Featured artists" guideline for track and release titles.
> >> That's just the old release title guideline. What happens with the
> >> artist credit?
> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style/Release briefly mentions how to enter
> > the release artist, we don't have have a page like that for tracks.
> > -- kuno / warp.
> > _______________________________________________
> > MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> > MusicBrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> Ok, let's take a step back then. If the current guideline only
> applies to recordings,
> should I alter this proposal to also just concern recordings and release
> (i.e. the bit about moving the feat. part to the artist credit)?
> I think it should have been made much clearer that there weren't any rules
> track or release titles, because it certainly wasn't clear from the
> I've followed. Also, I can understand the choice between track and
> recording titles
> for unnormalised/normalised data, but is the same thing supposed to apply
> releases and release groups?
> Andii :-)
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MusicBrainz-style