[mb-style] pre-RFC: CSG for works, part I: titled works
anarchyriot at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 23:55:34 UTC 2011
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:20 AM, symphonick <symphonick at gmail.com> wrote:
> Aliases: For titled works, use only if the work is known locally under a
> different name.
> English aliases for the examples above:
What about the use of quotation marks for titles, including titles of
movements and non-official titles? I'm thinking of something like the
Moonlight Sonata for the latter example.
Disambiguation: use the comment field to separate different versions with
> the same title (by the same composer). Not necessary if the catalog
> numbers differs.
> Appalachian Spring (Ballet)
> Appalachian Spring (Orchestral suite)
> Nun komm der Heiden Heiland, BWV 599
> Nun komm' der Heiden Heiland, BWV 659
I think it'd be OK to suggest those be included, even with catalog numbers
(or in comments, as long as they're visible in search pop-ups). Most
editors (including me) probably won't know offhand which version "BWV 599"
is. Also in the examples above, should "Ballet" and "Orchestral" be
> Multi-part works: The title of the main work must be repeated in the
> parts, otherwise one composer could have a lot of works named only
> "allegro", which would currently be difficult to work with.
This is for works only, not for tracklistings? (I hate seeing the full work
title on every single track of a release that only includes one work.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MusicBrainz-style