[mb-style] pre-RFC: CSG for works, part I: titled works

David Gasaway dave at gasaway.org
Wed Jul 20 15:49:38 UTC 2011


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:50, Lemire, Sebastien <mail at benji99.ca> wrote:
> 3.) Regarding catalog numbers, although the ultimate solution will be to
> have the catalog data stored independently as I've already suggested in
> another thread, what would the style be when there's multiple catalogs?
> Should the Opus (if available always be listed first with additional
> catalogs added in '()'? Should this be flexible on a per-composer basis?

How about adding an alias for each catalog?

> 4.) We need to decide once for all certain naming conventions that are both
> valid but for consistencies sake should be singled out to one (across all
> works for all composers)
> Examples:
> - Sonata for Piano ... vs Piano Sonata ...
> - Piano Concerto ... vs Concerto for Piano ...

As an aside, I would prefer if we discontinue the use of proper case
for these titles.  They're not really proper titles.


-- 
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org



More information about the MusicBrainz-style mailing list