[mb-style] RFV: 327 Featured Artists

Nikki aeizyx at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 16:46:21 UTC 2011

I don't have a problem with the guideline itself, but I find the 
examples rather awkward to read (and there's nothing that shows the 
final outcome nor any links to entities in the database that you can 
look at). For me it would be a lot clearer to just have something like:

The song "Umbrella" by Rihanna featuring Jay-Z would be entered as:
Recording name: [Umbrella]
Artists: [Rihanna] feat. [Jay-Z]

(where square brackets indicate links to the relevant entities, like 
they would be shown on the server).


Andii Hughes wrote:
> Expected passage date: 23rd of July, 2011 (~2 days)
> The proposal:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Featured_Artists
> updates the http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Recording_and_release_group_titles/Featured_artists
> guideline for recordings and release groups.
> Instead of the old form for featured artists:
> "X (feat. Y)" by Z
> a new form is used which makes use of artist credits:
> "X" by Z feat. Y
> where Z and Y are artists in the DB and ' feat. ' is the join term.
> This covers recordings and release groups *ONLY*.  The discussion on
> this at RFC clarified that the current guidelines only apply to
> recordings & release groups,
> and that none yet exist for tracks and release titles other than
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Track_and_release_titles
> Please be advised that vetoing this proposal will retain the current
> recording guideline of including 'feat.' crediting in the track title
> for recordings and release groups.
> I have seen no-one in favour of this position during the RFC stage,
> but yet there have been explicit intentions to veto from some on
> indeterminate grounds.
> Thanks,

More information about the MusicBrainz-style mailing list