[mb-style] Pre-RFC: CSG - work types

Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosarevok at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 17:27:01 UTC 2011


On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:21 PM, symphonick <symphonick at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:32:41 +0200, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> <reosarevok at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I see two main questions here to begin with (surely some more to come).
>>
>> Question 1 is fairly straightforward: are we missing any important
>> ones?Question 2: when we have, for example, a sonata in 3 movements, is
>> "Sonata" to be used for all 4 works, or only for the parent and not
>> for the movements?
>>
> It depends. Unless we can use more than one worktype for a part, if we
> don't stick with the main work, sub-parts would end up under anything.
> So IF we could sort by work attribute we'd get something like:
>
> Menuets:
> Suite pour Violoncelle N° 1. BWV 1007: Menuet I / Menuet II
> ...
> Suites:
> Suite pour Violoncelle N° 1. BWV 1007
>
> But maybe this is acceptable? The works would be linked together.

Right now I'm not setting anything for them, because it feels kinda
stupid, for example, to call an opera scene "Opera" (it even calls it
Opera "Work Name" in the page title). But I'm not sure about what's
better, let's see more opinions :)

> /symphonick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style



-- 
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren



More information about the MusicBrainz-style mailing list