[mb-style] Later version vs. Derivative work

Frederic Da Vitoria davitofrg at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 12:49:24 UTC 2011


Done. Sorry, I forgot to give an edit comment on my second edit. I
edited the guidelines too, but if anyone disagrees, please undo.

2011/7/26, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosarevok at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I also think "This links two versions of a work" is too broad. If X
>> and Y are *independently* derived from Z, I don't see a point in
>> entering a X <-> Y AR. So I'd replace the above sentence
>> with something like "This links two versions of a work where one of
>> the versions is derived from the other".
>
> Agreed that it's too broad, I just wasn't too sure what to use there
> without introducing "derived" or "based of", which made it sound as if
> it was my "new version" of it instead of just a factual update.


-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org



More information about the MusicBrainz-style mailing list