[mb-style] RFV: Extend Official Homepage Relationship Type toReleases
aeizyx at gmail.com
Fri Jun 3 12:43:42 UTC 2011
Since this RFV generated more discussion, I'm guessing the proposal
wasn't ready for RFV yet and should revert back to an RFC.
Aurélien Mino wrote:
> In a general way, I'm opposed to have the same relationship defined at
> both release and release-group level.
> Because this will only confuse people, and you'll end up with the
> relationships sometimes defined at a level, sometimes on another,
> and sometimes at both.
This was one of my concerns too.
> I think this relationship type you be defined at release-group level
> only, and this I'm considering vetoing this proposal.
> I've not seen a good reason why release-group level doesn't qualify.
As Calvin asked, are you OK with the discography page one being
More information about the MusicBrainz-style