[mb-style] RFV: Extend Official Homepage Relationship Type toReleases

[Nikki]

Since this RFV generated more discussion, I'm guessing the proposal 
wasn't ready for RFV yet and should revert back to an RFC.

Aurélien Mino wrote:
> In a general way, I'm opposed to have the same relationship defined at 
> both release and release-group level.
> Because this will only confuse people, and you'll end up with the 
> relationships sometimes defined at a level, sometimes on another,
> and sometimes at both.

This was one of my concerns too.

> I think this relationship type you be defined at release-group level 
> only, and this I'm considering vetoing this proposal.
> I've not seen a good reason why release-group level doesn't qualify.

As Calvin asked, are you OK with the discography page one being 
release-level?

Nikki