[mb-style] RFV-321: Work parts relationship

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2011/6/10 symphonick <symphonick at gmail.com>

> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:30:58 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I understand what you are saying or that you understood
> > Sebastien's suggestion (which was already made by someone else IIRC):
> > Don't
> > split an opera in smaller parts than acts if the composer did not clearly
> > define lower-level split points.
>
> You're right, I didn't understand.
> "Don't split works in smaller parts if the composer did not clearly define
> lower-level split points" sounds like good starting point. Which means
> we'll have to check works against good sources, urtext editions where
> possible. Otherwise it's going to be guesswork.
>

Yes, guesswork and votes :-)

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20110611/b8b8fe15/attachment.htm