[mb-style] Partial performances of aggregate works
Frederic Da Vitoria
davitofrg at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 08:56:38 UTC 2011
2011/6/30, symphonick <symphonick at gmail.com>:
> 2011/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosarevok at gmail.com>
>
>> Why? What is false about the statement "This is a partial performance
>> of this superwork", which also allows it to inherit the composer info?
>> Complete info > Incomplete but correct info > no info > bad info.
>> I'd say this is a case of 2.
>>
>> It's not false, it's inaccurate (& see the edit notes about whether
> recordings should be allowed for this work at all) & as I said, I rather
> have high-quality data.
But by removing the AR, you are saying that the recording is not from
the Planets, which is not inaccurate: it is completely false.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
More information about the MusicBrainz-style
mailing list