[mb-users] Question about inconsitencies in track naming
fox.box at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 03:16:39 UTC 2005
On 6/18/05, Daniel Bumke <danielbumke at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not just use the "is the same as" (or something) AR relationship
> to denote that they are identical. Then it doesn't matter that the
> names aren't the same.
There is no such relationship.
There is only A "is the earliest release of" B, but this one is almost
useless atm, because most "earliest releases" are not listed in MB,
because they had been released on vinyl.
And using MB for tagging your oggs would become a pain, you had to
check and correct all those tags. It would be easier doing it all by
Björn 'Fuchs' Krombholz
More information about the MusicBrainz-users