[mb-users] "DJ-mixed by" relationship type (again)
03999128 at exon.dyndns.org
Thu Jun 30 17:32:22 UTC 2005
david scotson wrote:
> Gets my vote too. So who do we need to convince in order to get this
> and 'compiled by' added to the AR list? Earlier comments suggest we'd
> need to write up some documentation, so what do we need to write and
> where should we write it?
You need to write something called "<Blah>RelationshipType" that looks
However, that particular page is *very* light on examples. For this
case, I'd want examples more like what's over at:
Then, you're going to have to brace yourselves for a *lot* of questions,
proof-reading, corrections, and suggestions.
None of this guarantees that the idea will get implemented. It'll just
provide the structure for coming up with the good definitions that Don
and I are insisting on.
I can tell you from experience that nothing seems like it's going to end
up as a big mess until you actually see it running for real. Then it
becomes *real* obvious :-( Writing things down in nice clear sentences
and ridiculous detail is an essential part of the process of coming to
realise just how big a mess it's going to turn out to be...
More information about the MusicBrainz-users