[mb-users] "Disc #" v. "Vol. #"
Thomas Tholén
badnewsbnw at gmail.com
Thu Dec 7 23:44:03 UTC 2006
Why not just use named disc-style like normal? "Foo (disc 1: volume 1)"
//[bnw]
On 12/7/06, Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Recently a discussion came up regarding changing "disc #" to "Vol. #"
> on a release: http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=6081833.
>
> gfmorris thought that ArtistIntent meant that it should be switched to
> "Vol. #". However, based on BoxSetNameStyle and DiscNumberStyle, I
> voted 'no', thinking that this wasn't a case which warranted deviating
> from those docs. (I guess you could always read the notes on the edit.
> :)
>
> Anyway, wondering what y'all thought about it.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20061208/6049a141/attachment.htm
More information about the MusicBrainz-users
mailing list