[mailing] Re: [mb-users] AR for "so-and-so wrote cadenza"

Marco Sola marcosola at oksatcom.it
Mon Dec 11 07:02:18 UTC 2006


Il Monday, December 11, 2006 3:09 AM
Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling at gmail.com> ha scritto:

>> It surely deserves an AR but note that often is not written, it's
>> just improvisation so it could be hard to find the right verb. And
>> since it's a very peculiar and different way to play a work I think
>> it is anyway proper to have it in TrackTitile.
>
> Can you explain more about what you mean? I don't think it should be
> in the track title any more than an arranger of a track should be.
> Usually it's not peculiar to the form (e.g. concerto), so I don't
> understand.

Maybe it's just my english that is lacking ;-) I mean that if you take two 
LvB violin concerto they coud have two  completely different (wrong use of 
peculiar) movement depending by candenzas used.

Arranger example could be proper but maybe not because in classical you 
expect to hear the work in the way it was written so an improvisation like 
cadenza is a notable fact.

> As for an appropriate verb, why not just "TrackName has a/the cadenza
> by SoAndSo"?

And the reverse?

Ciao

MArco (ClutchEr2) 




More information about the MusicBrainz-users mailing list