[mailing] Re: [mb-users] AR for "so-and-so wrote cadenza"

[Aaron Cooper]

On 12/11/06, Marco Sola <marcosola at oksatcom.it> wrote:
> Il Monday, December 11, 2006 3:09 AM
> Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> >> It surely deserves an AR but note that often is not written, it's
> >> just improvisation so it could be hard to find the right verb. And
> >> since it's a very peculiar and different way to play a work I think
> >> it is anyway proper to have it in TrackTitile.
> >
> > Can you explain more about what you mean? I don't think it should be
> > in the track title any more than an arranger of a track should be.
> > Usually it's not peculiar to the form (e.g. concerto), so I don't
> > understand.
>
> Maybe it's just my english that is lacking ;-) I mean that if you take two
> LvB violin concerto they coud have two  completely different (wrong use of
> peculiar) movement depending by candenzas used.
>
> Arranger example could be proper but maybe not because in classical you
> expect to hear the work in the way it was written so an improvisation like
> cadenza is a notable fact.
>
> > As for an appropriate verb, why not just "TrackName has a/the cadenza
> > by SoAndSo"?
>
> And the reverse?
>
> Ciao
>
> MArco (ClutchEr2)
>
>

SoAndSo wrote a/the cadenza for TrackName?
-- 
-Aaron