[mailing] Re: [mb-users] AR for "so-and-so wrote cadenza"

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2006/12/11, Marco Sola <marcosola at oksatcom.it>:
> Il Monday, December 11, 2006 8:29 AM
> Lauri Watts <krazykiwi at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> >>> Arranger example could be proper but maybe not because in classical
> >>> you expect to hear the work in the way it was written so an
> >>> improvisation like cadenza is a notable fact.
> >>>
> >>>> As for an appropriate verb, why not just "TrackName has a/the
> >>>> cadenza by SoAndSo"?
> >>>
> >>> And the reverse?
> >
> > So a cadenza is kind of the classical version of a remix?
>
> Not exactly, since there's no "main theme" to be based on. It could be just
> an improvisation without quite any link with the original work, even if
> often performers try to "recall" the general work as much as possibile.
>
> Ciao
>
> Marco (ClutchEr2)

And it is a subpart of a movement. This means that it is included in a
track, it does not make a track by itself (at least I never saw a
track with only a cadenza on it).

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria