[mb-users] HowToWriteEditNotes

[Rob Keeney]

Not sure where this fits into your list of Best to Bad but I like to
use AllMusic.com (AMG). I find it mostly reliable. I don't like that
user input is slow to implement (if ever) but otherwise a good
resource.

Rob...............

On 11/7/06, Kerensky97 <kerensky97 at xterra101.com> wrote:
>
>
> bogdanb wrote:
> >
> > It might be useful to add a little list of what kind of proof is good
> > and bad for some edit types where you noticed users make mistakes all
> > the time.
> >
> It's not specific to edit types but here's my general list on good and bad
> sources.
>
> Best, direct from the producer/artist info:
> Legally purchased CD's
> Official band sites
> Official label sites
>
> Good, community edited sites:
> Wikipedia
> Discogs
> Fan communities
>
> So-So, corporate sites and independant fans:
> Amazon
> HMV
> Barnes & Noble
> CD Universe
> Fan Sites/Blogs
>
> Bad, illegal sites and file trading communities:
> Torrent sites
> Download sites
> Sites that gather data using bots scouring the web (untrustworthy)
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HowToWriteEditNotes-tf2589572s2885.html#a7230223
> Sent from the Musicbrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>